Thursday December 7 th |
| 8.30 h - 9.30 h |
Registration & Coffee
Books and demonstration
|
| 9.30 h - 10.15 h |
General Welcome and Opening :
Dr Marie-Christine Kessler, Directrice-adjointe CERSA
Elisabeth Giacobino, direction générale CNRS
Danièle Bourcier,Organizing Chair JURIX 2006
Tom van Engers, JURIX Program Chair
Radboud Winkels , JURIX foundation Chair
|
| 10.15 h - 11.00 h |
Invited Address:
AI Models for Negociation for Social Sciences
Ron Loui , Washington University
|
| Coffee break |
|
Session 1: Legal sources
|
| 11.15 h - 11.45 h |
Automated detection of Reference Structures in Law
Emile De Maat, Radboud Winkels & Tom von Engers
|
| 11.45 h - 12.15 h |
Improving legal document Summarization using Graphical Models
M. Saravan, B. Ravindran & S. Raman
|
| 12.15 h - 12.45 h |
Theaurus-based Retrieval of Case law
M. Klein, W. van Steenbergen, E. Uijttenbroek, A. Lodder
|
| Lunch |
| |
Session 2 : Legal Ontologies
|
| 14.00 h - 14.30 h |
An OWL ontology of Fundamental Legal Concepts
Rossella Rubino, Antonino Rotolo & Giovanni Sartor
|
| |
Discordance Detection in Regional Ordinance: Ontology-based Validation
S. Hagiwara & S.Tojo
|
| |
Session 3 : Legal Knowledge Representation
|
| 14.45 h - 15.15 h |
Deterrence under Uncertainty : a case study
Bram Roth
|
| 15.15 h - 15.45 h |
Open and Closed Intermediaries in Normative Systems
Lars Lindahl & Jan Odelstad
|
| |
Announcements |
| 16.00 h |
End of the presentations of the first day
|
| 17.00 h |
Visite of Palais du Luxembourg
Virtual visit first ! 
|
| 21.15 h |
Gala & Cruise Conference Dinner
More details
Keynote speaker : Burkhard Schafer (John Bell Institute, Edinburgh)
"Murder, Mayhem, Method: Computational reasoning about crime in law and fiction "
inspired by the "Debout les morts" by the French detective writer Fred Vargas…
|
Friday December 8 th |
| |
Session 4 : Argumentation & reasoning
|
| 10.00 h - 10.30 h |
Zeno revisited : Representation of persuasive argument
K. Atkinson & T. Bench-Capon
|
| 10.30 h - 11.00 h |
Anchored Narratives in reasoning about evidence
F. Bex, H. Prakken & B. Verheij
|
| Coffee break |
| 11.30 h - 12.00 h |
Presumptions and Burdens of proof
H. Prakken & G. Sartor
|
| 12.00 h - 12.30 h |
Modelling state intervention in cases of confliting interests
H. A. Chorley & T. Bench-Capon
|
| Lunch |
| |
Session A : Short papers
|
| 13.30 h - 13.45 h |
Disjunction of causes and disjunctive cause: a solution to the paradox of conditio sine qua non using Minimal Abduction
Ken Satoh & Satoshi Tojo
|
| 13.45 h - 14.00 h |
Developing content for LKIF: Ontologies and frameworks for legal reasoning
J. Breuker, A. Boer, R. Hoekstra & K. van den Berg
|
| 14.00 h - 14.15 h |
AVER : Argument Visualization for Evidential Reasoning
S. van den Braak & G. Vreeswijk
|
| 14.15 h - 14.30 h |
An Action-based legal model for Dynamic Digital Rights Expressions
Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay
|
| Coffee break |
| |
Session 5 : Legal Applications
|
| 14.45 h - 15.15 h |
Handling Personal Injury Claims PICE
C. van Zeeland, R. Leenes, J. van Veenen & J. van der Linden
|
| 15.15 h - 15.45 h |
Application of Word alignment for supporting Translation of japonese Statutes into English
K. Toyama, Y. Ogawa, K. Imai & Y. Matsuura
|
| 15.45 h - 16.15 h |
A public Index of cases Law references- The end of multiple and complex Citations
M. van Opijnen
|
Coffee break |
| 16.30 h |
Awarding Master Thesis CNRS
RTP Droit & Systèmes d’information 2006
|
| |
Closing of the JURIX 2006 Conference
Radboud Winkels , JURIX Chair
Announcement of th JURIX 2007 Conference
Books and demos
TEKNE
ADMINISTRAL data bank (CERSA, ENA, Vile de Paris)
|
Cocktail |
| Saturday December 9 th (Salle des Conseils) |
Workshop 1 Download full Programme PDF
|
| Workshop 2 :
International Cooperation for Better Legislation and Public Participation |
The workshop "International Cooperation for Better Legislation and Public Participation" intends to speculate methods and techniques for improving legal quality and access to legislation, how standards can contribute to legislative informatics and which tools are needed. The focus is on improving the quality and accessibility of legislation and public participation and promote in a new paradigm where the citizens and stakeholders are involved from the very beginning of the legislative process and where legislation, in order to favour this, strive to be “understandable” and not just a matter for “experts”. It is the concept of networked legislation : legislate by reconnecting with the citizens. Moreover the International Cooperation with other extra-EU regions (e.g. Africa) make this speculative research more challenging and promising to reach a real interoperability and robustness of the solutions and to promote better understating and collaboration among countries.
|
| Organizing Committee |
Tom van Engers, University of Amsterdam , NL, vanEngers@chello.nl
Monica Palmirani, University of Bologna , IT, palmiran@cirfid.unibo.it
Giovanni Sartor, European Institute, IT, giovanni.sartor@iue.it
|
| 9h - 11h |
Session 1
Legal resource quality and standards
Chairman Monica Palmirani
|
| Coffee break |
| 11h10 - 12h |
Round table
Chairman Tom Von Engers
|
| 12h - 13h |
Session 2
Opportunities and Chalenges for cooperation in the 7thFP
Chairman : Giovani Sartor
|
| 13h30 |
Final considerations.
|
Workshop 2 Download full Programme PDF
|
| Workshop 2 : Law as a complex evolving system |
During the JURIX 2003 Conference in Utrecht, the CERSA organized a meeting announcing that an Interdisciplinary Program on Complex Systems was in progress in Europe and in France. Law was presented as a part of this program. On November 25, 2006, the Groupement d’Intérêt Scientifique (GIS) “Réseau National Systèmes Complexes” which supports the General Program has been signed by several Scientific Institutions (CNRS, INRIA and more than 10 Scientific Organizations at this moment).
It is time to think collectively on the way law can be inserted in this Program. Our colleagues from other scientific domains have already written a draft for a general road map. (See http://complexsystems.lri.fr/RNSC/).
Today, the stake is to gather all the legal scientists, law researchers, law practioners to write a “road map” for studying Law as an evolutionary and dynamic complex systems. Everybody claims that law is becoming complex but without means to deal with this complexity
The workshop 2 will take the opportunity of the presence of other legal scientists of 15 countries to debate on the main needs of research in this field.
|
| 14 h - 15.30 h |
Fundamentals on law and complex systems.
What does the science of Complex systems mean ? What benefit for law? Does it echo in other legal systems?
What is the science of complex systems ?
Paul Bourgine, CREA, Polytechnique
Complexity in environnemental and legal systems
Pierre Mazzega, LMTG Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées.
Round table
Benefit for legal science and practice : examples in legistics and decision making.
Daniele Bourcier, CNRS, Paris/Berlin, Filipe Borges, Ministère de la Jutice, Giovanni Sartor, Université de Bologne, Véronique Tauziac, Service de légistique.
|
15.30 Coffee break |
| 15.45 h - 17.15 h |
Pratices and modelling legal objects and issues.
Work in two parallel groups to define concepts fields and ontologies in legal field.
|
| 17.15 h |
Reports and conclusions for a road map.
|